Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them, while others believe that this won't work.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is almost no doubt among nutrition experts that processed foods, which are commonly known as fast food or junk food, are indeed “junk” food. They carry little or no nutritious substances and are often high in fat and other harmful substances. Despite this fact, they are vastly consumed by people, specially the youth, and this is a major health problem in almost every country around the globe.
However, how society should tackle this situation remains subject to controversy. Some individuals believe that the best way to uproot this problem is educating people. After all, no rational person will eat something if he believes it is harmful for his body and can possibly endanger his life. Educating people will be the most effective, if it is commenced from an early age, when they are children in primary school or even preschool. Psychologists tell us that if a child internalizes a value, he will most likely stick to it later in his life.
On the other hand, some people disagree with this argument. A common example among these category is smoking. Research suggests that almost every smoker is to some degree aware of the consequences of smoking, yet this knowledge to not interpret into quitting. This school of thought is a strong advocate of government regulation that limit the consumption of junk food, like regulation around smoking.
In conclusion, health subjects are always a matter of great debate both in academia and among citizens. In my opinion, adequate education is necessary for school goers to internalize the value of eating healthy food and build up the culture, and then a minimal regulation to ensure production and distribution of harmful products are ceased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is almost no doubt among nutrition...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lmost every country around the globe. However, how society should tackle this ...
^^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...believes it is harmful for his body and can possibly endanger his life. Educating people wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... likely stick to it later in his life. On the other hand, some people disagree ...
^^^
Line 6, column 84, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this category' or 'these categories'?
Suggestion: this category; these categories
...h this argument. A common example among these category is smoking. Research suggests that almo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...food, like regulation around smoking. In conclusion, health subjects are alway...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, after all, in conclusion, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 5.60731707317 464% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 281.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12099644128 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74061096161 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 106.607317073 165% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626334519573 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2830687075 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.785714286 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263074050224 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770162916049 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648223133674 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137720457443 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220607089755 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.