The vital role of history depends on the interpretation of every individual. In this light, others believe that history is imperatively necessary in school curriculumn, while some people support the opinion that some subjects such as Science and Technology should be given more of the necessary attention. In the writers view, although both arguments have plausible reasons, they are equally beneficial.
Aparrently, it cannot be denied that history has something to do with the present. The past serves as the basis of the present in preventing actions that could be disastrous for the majority. As an exemplification, the horrible atrocities of world war 1 and 2 have led to the organization of the United Nations to maintain peace, which we harmoniously enjoy. Another thing to consider is broadening the knowledge of young generations with regards to our ever evolving cultural differences. It creates the medium of communication between radically diverse cultural perspectives, which propels the dilution and dissipitation of divisiveness due to ignorance. Because of these acceptable reasons, history is a crucial subject to be look upon.
However, there are also supporters of other practical subjects such science and technology. Obviously, we are living in the rapid technological innovations era, whereby the rise in the utilization of artificial intelligence affects the people's perspective. Nowadays, children are mandated by parents to merely focus on the subjects that will at least broaden their knowledge regarding the modern world, which in the long run, will help them in landing a job. Furthermore, Science and Technology talks about the conservation and survival of every living things. The saving of the environment needs a deeper understanding in the field of Science, thus its significance is indespensable. To exemplify, the dilemma of pollution that have been rapidly rising has been gradually being dealt with, using Science by inventing state-of-the-art machines to counter greenhouse effect, such as eco-friendly transportation system and renewable energy powering machines to mention a few. Therefore, it is undeniable that the attributes of Science and Technology subject are benefecial.
Given these both equally compelling statements, to maximally gain a better sophisticated view to be globally competetive, the combination of these subjects is appropriate to a holistic approach in the progress of education and at the same time the society, thus both are important.
To sum up, understanding the past is necessary to live the present, and to avoid cultural ignorance. Also, learning science and technology leads to an array of oppurtunities in this technological world. Nonetheless, if we combine these two subjects, it could fuel a positive development in education at present and for the future.
- Nowadays more people are choosing to live with friends or alone rather than with their families. This trend is likely to have a negative impact on communities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects, Others think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Techonology are more important than History.Disscuss both these view and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age and should spend most of their time on school studies. Others believe that young children should spend most of their time playing. Compare these two views. Which view 73
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'innovations'' or 'innovation's'?
Suggestion: innovations'; innovation's
...e are living in the rapid technological innovations era, whereby the rise in the utilizatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... of artificial intelligence affects the peoples perspective. Nowadays, children are man...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese both equally compelling statements, to maximally gain a better sophisticated...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, another thing, at least, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.0 300% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 33.7804878049 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 28.0 3.97073170732 705% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2412.0 965.302439024 250% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 433.0 196.424390244 220% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57043879908 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 3.73543355544 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28892200138 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 106.607317073 233% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572748267898 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 283.868780488 270% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6909084318 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.65 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168458203536 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455185793312 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047614281647 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973163887718 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530916122944 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 40.7170731707 356% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.