Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While one school of thought holds that zoos shouldn't be opened, others are of the opinion that it is where the wildlife animals are being protected. This essay will closely scrutinize both views before concluding I agree with the latter.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people acknowledge that zoos are horrible and should be prohibited. The key rationale is that some zoos mistreated many wildlife animals. This means the zoo's keepers didn’t provide enough food and drink for each animal to grow comprehensively. Proponents of such a ban might also emphasize that when confining these animals in a zoo where is not only narrow but also not the same as their previous habitat, they would easily suffer from stress and depression. Of course, this will have detrimental effects on their health, hence, these animals are not suitable and qualified for study and experiment. In this case, it is justifiable to prohibit zoos in the first place.
On the other hand, I side with those who say that zoos could help us to protect endangered animals. Firstly, the fears about inhuman zoo’s keepers and narrow space as mentioned before, are actually over-exaggerated. Apparently, this kind of zoo accounts for only a small part. Moreover, this problem actually could be solved by the government’s action. They can impose stringent punishments for those who do things that harm the wild animals or they also can allocate more money to expand the zoo's space, which also might fuel the overall economy especially in the tourism sector. In addition to this, these zoos are the necessity places to protect animals from many negative effects which lead to their extinction, for example hunters, predators.
In conclusion, while there are justifications that zoos should be prohibited, I would contend that it should be opened in terms of protecting endangered animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-15 | nguyenkhangtriem | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | viethung123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | viethung123 | 78 | view |
- Fewer and fewer people today right by hand using a pen pencil or brush What are the reasons Is this a positive or a negative development 11
- Some people think that the governments should care more about the elderly while others argue that it is better to invest in the young generatiom in terms of education Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph shows the number of oversea visitors to three different areas in an European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 84
- As housing is a basis need some people believe that the government should provide the free housing for people who cannot afford it To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...e one school of thought holds that zoos shouldnt be opened, others are of the opinion th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: OVER_EXAGGERATED[2]
Message: Use simply 'exaggerated'.
Suggestion: exaggerated
...space as mentioned before, are actually over-exaggerated. Apparently, this kind of zoo accounts ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple hunters, predators. In conclusion, while there are justifications that zoos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, of course, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 3.15609756098 507% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 5.60731707317 624% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 965.302439024 163% => OK
No of words: 307.0 196.424390244 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12052117264 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76333638352 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 106.607317073 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57654723127 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 283.868780488 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 1.53170731707 849% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.16931333 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9333333333 5.23603664747 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325768968906 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110828659085 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693310686611 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220609159446 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305692909404 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.