Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
One school of thought holds that traditional newspapers are the optimal source to get news, however, others acknowledge that it is better to learn from other media. In this essay, I will scrutinize both views before concluding that I agree with the latter.
On the one hand, it is understandable why many people think that conventional newspapers are the most effective method to get news. The primary rationale is that the information contained was written by journalists, which was cross-checked or carefully edited. This means this kind of media is a trustworthy source of news and can effectively impart information to the general public. Nowadays, when fake news is rampant because of the spread of social media such as Facebook, people, especially teenagers, are often susceptible to misinformation. Consequently, people could have distorted perceptions about current affairs. In this case, it is justifiable to learn news from newspapers.
On the other hand, I side with those who say that news could be obtained not only from newspapers but also from other media. Firstly, advancement in technology has facilitated the development of digital journalism, where news undergoes vigorous checks before being published. Moreover, while reading conventional newspapers makes readers purchase money everyday to get news, digital journalism offers a one-time investment for accessing to information and this source of information is of no less dependability compared to that from traditional newspapers. In addition to this, digital newspapers are better than their conventional counterparts in term of real-time updates. Don’t need traditional production processes, when writing is finished, journalists promptly update their articles on websites so that the general public can access the information.
In conclusion, while there is justification that traditional newspapers are the foremost method to get news, I would contend that there are many trustworthy sources such as digital journalism where everyone could access the news more easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-29 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | bnhi | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | kienbanhkem | 84 | view |
- People in community can buy cheaper products nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 78
- Everyday millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 56
- Some people think that the governments should care more about the elderly while others argue that it is better to invest in the young generatiom in terms of education Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- People in community can buy cheaper products nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n effectively impart information to the general public. Nowadays, when fake news is rampant be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...newspapers makes readers purchase money everyday to get news, digital journalism offers ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 813, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... their articles on websites so that the general public can access the information. In conclus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63754045307 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1442856739 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4735520363 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256575089245 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915497915882 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073399286175 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171513286374 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632721084274 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.