Stone Age cutting tools
The two pictures illustrate the basic differences of the Stone Age cutting tools used 1.4 million and 0.8 million years ago.
Overall, there are remarkable differences in terms of the shape and sophistication of these so-called hand axes.
The pictures of tool A depict a cutting tool dating back to 1.6 million years ago. This tool has a length of about 10 centimeters and rough surfaces. It has no appropriate shape crafted for cutting or smashing which proves the poor workmanship of people at that time. Although this handed axe has a relatively pointed end, its edges are not well-processed which could result in discomfort for users.
The pictures of tool B illustrate a well-shaped cutting tool used 0.8 million years ago. This tool has a length of over 10 centimeters and flat surfaces. It has a tear-drop shape with a pointed end and rounded handle. Since it is shaped symmetrical along its longitudinal axis its mass is equally distributed to the whole tool which makes it perfectly balanced. It is also a double-edged axe with edges sharpened to serve the purpose of butchering animals and chopping wood.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | sunflower1190 | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-18 | reverjae | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-18 | reverjae | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-18 | reverjae | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-05 | imurminhanh | 89 | view |
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development Others however argue that they are dangerous and have negative impacts on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Stone Age cutting tools 78
- Stone Age cutting tools 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...called hand axes. The pictures of tool A depict a cutting tool dating back to 1.6 milli...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... with a pointed end and rounded handle. Since it is shaped symmetrical along its long...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96276595745 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88042106065 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3888437202 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8181818182 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09090909091 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308577389387 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115164969211 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128049582611 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186252248425 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134634609646 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.