The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001.
The given table depicts how an average Australian allocated their money monthly from 1991 and 2001.
Overall, it is clearly seen that the amount of money spent increased over the year and most of the expenditure went for food.
A closer look at the statistics reveals that in 1991, the average quantity of money spent on food each month was top-charted at 155 dollars, far exceeding the following figure. In the subsequent decade, the Australian witnessed a slight rise by 5 dollars in the money spent on food. It is observed in the table that the expenditure on housing was higher than that of electricity and water by a wide margin, with the disparity of 20 dollars. The figures then both followed upwards trends with the latter at 120 and the former at 100 dollars.
In contrast, from the initial figure of 70 dollars, the money invested in transportation underwent a dramatical decline to merely 45 dollars. Likewise, there was a reduction by 10 dollars in the amount of expenditures on clothing, making it the lowest position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | shailipatel | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | Drake004 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | Mphthao | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | Mphthao | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Phuong Khanh | 73 | view |
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Computers 78
- leadership 11
- environmental pollution 89
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, look, then, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85875706215 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73587534162 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4902694399 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202892573503 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907086033088 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120604298062 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145791990689 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148700876299 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.