The sum of tourists and the total budget spent among 5 different countries between 2012 and 2013 are displayed in the table.
The sum of tourists and the total budget spent among 5 different countries between 2012 and 2013 are displayed in the table.
In general, while the majority of countries underwent an increase in visitors, those in China showed the reverse. However, no downturn in tourists’ expenses was seen with the US attracting the highest.
In 2012, France attracted the most tourists with 83 million people, making up to $53.6 billion in transactions. Meanwhile, Italy only made up half of France’s visitors which contributed up to, $41.2 billion in transactions. More than 57 million people visited Spain and China while those in Spain spent a $6 billion higher budget than China. Also, the US had 66.7 visitors, with $126.2 billion in transactions.
A year later, although an increase in France’s visitors remained the highest, the largest transactions were seen in the US with $139.6 billion. Also, while both China's and Spain's tourist transactions rose, only the former received more visitors by 3 million people. Italy remained to have the least visitors and tourist transactions by the end of the year with only 47 million people which contributed to a $43 billion bill.
- The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016 61
- Growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on healthcare system in an effort to deal with health issue involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lesson in the shool curricul 78
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some feel that the effects of advertising are positive for individuals and businesses while others think they are harmful Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- In spite of advances made in agriculture many people around the world still hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n and China while those in Spain spent a billion higher budget than China. Also, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78780486327 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9041837342 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215744383908 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116337150953 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.248845772181 0.0843802449381 295% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254892782938 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.34880741709 0.0819641961636 426% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.