The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table and pie charts present the police financial budget and its distribution in one region of Britain during the two consecutive years: 2017 and 2018.
Overall, the total budget increased in terms of all categories. It is also noticeable that all parts of the money allocation experienced a growth, except for salaries.
As for the table, National Government accounted for roughly 60% in the first year and had an addition of about £2m in the second year. Local Taxes held the second position at £91.2m and grew by over £10m. Other sources took up around 10% of the total budget at the start, then rose slightly by £0.5m in 2018.
As regards the pie charts, buildings and transport received the same figure of 17% during the two years. In contrast, there was a nearly twofold increase in the category of technology. The officers and staff members’ incomes occupied three-fourths of the allocated money in 2017, but fell by 6% in the second year although the police budget witnessed an upward trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- People continue to re commit crimes even after being penalized for their wrongdoings Why do you thinik this happen How can crime be stopped 84
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a frog Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to 3 different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, then, as for, as regards, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90173410405 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57756806477 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647398843931 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7186751125 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172891697221 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603468287429 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756114515766 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109978311594 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892252462092 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.