Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school?
What are the reasons? What could be done to solve this problem?
It is a fact that many students have shorter attentions spans these days. This predicament can be traced back to peer pressure and the nature of conventional form of education. The most promising solutions could be stricter supervision and alterations in teaching methodology.
A lack of concentration in school is probably caused by schoolmates’ influence and academic overload. Admittedly, the negative influence of friends can exert a detrimental effect on academic performance. Take an example of children befriending a chronically absent group of peers; they may develop a tendency to become truants and join them in more interesting social activities. Negligence in academic pursuits can thus be precipitated by inconsistent presence, and serious risk of falling behind with their studies posed as a result. Another key factor may be due to the students’ workload which is notoriously hectic. Most students these days are often overwhelmed with a high volume of both in-class assignments and homework which strongly engender a feeling of tension. Hence, one defense mechanism from the students is to either not listen to teachers’ instructions or forfeit their enthusiasm for personal studies.
In order to curb this pressing issue, solutions should come from both families and educators. To begin with, is it a good idea that careful parental guidance is formed. To be more specific, parents should give children instructions on how to discern healthy and toxic friendships so that they can avoid making strong bonds with negative classmates later. For instance, the parents can tell them a story about travesties of socializing with antagonistic peers. Their children, therefore, may have a closer look on the potential consequences of ignoring school performance. On the school side, teaching syllabi should also be modified by reducing the amount of schoolwork, thus enhancing motivation among children. In this way, their stress would be much relieved, which leads to an improvement regarding in-class participation and behavior.
In summary, little attention at school might be due to peer effect and a heavy workload. Parental supervision as well as abridged teaching curriculums can be feasible solutions to this matter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | ngo viet | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Nguyen Hai Dang | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in prices of three metals during 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2022 by four different modes of transport 73
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
- The diagrams below compare the layout of a typical Japanese office and a typical American office Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages out outweigh the disadvantages 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in summary, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51014492754 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0928582083 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614492753623 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3331001124 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.052631579 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1578947368 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159623810365 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498442337017 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412420417615 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115725015542 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419262049858 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.