The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe

The table and the charts demonstrate the police budget and the money consumed in a specific area in Britain 2017-2018.

There was an increase in the police budget, and the way of fund-using changed a little.

In detail, as for the police budget, the table indicates that the money from local taxes was raised most with an 11.1 million pounds increment, as for the other two primary resources, the money appropriated by the National Government and the other resources raised not visibly.

The chart shows how the funds spent by the police changed a few Most of the money was spent on salaries each year, while there was a six percent decline from 2017 to 2018. Since the proportion taken by the buildings and transport in 2017 equalized that in 2018, the technology payment rose by 6 percent.

Finally, from the data on the police budget and payment items, we can find more money from local taxes. Meanwhile, the police spend more on technology, which is the apparent change in the two years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Most seems to be countable; consider using: 'few '.
Suggestion: few
...the funds spent by the police changed a few Most of the money was spent on salaries each...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80346820809 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43000170431 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554913294798 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6312271764 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325844208166 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14787026957 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11031454678 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183330072136 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101866657779 0.0819641961636 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.