The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table and pie charts sketch out the information about the flow of money's sources and the percentage of the allocation derived from it that occurred in Britain.
Overall, there was witnessed an upward trend in the table, meanwhile, 2 pie charts experienced a contrasting movement over the given period.
In terms of the table's information, the money's resources were derived from national state, local taxes, and other sources. To begin with, over a year, the regional government's budget increased slightly from 175,5m to 177,8m. Coincidently, both local taxes and others' data in 2017 stood at 91,2m and 38m respectively, which was 11,1m and 0,5m appropriately lower than the figure of those in 2018.
Moving to the proportion of the distribution of money. Surprisingly, the wage's rate spent for employees in 2017 and 2018 was identical, at 17%. However, between 2017 and 2018, the technology's fraction increased marginally by 5%, whereas, the money spent on infrastructures such as buildings and transport made up a differently changeable movement, from 75% to 69%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The advantages brought by the spread of english as a global language will continue to outweight the disadvantages Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think healthcare should be free for everyone others think that people should pay for their medical costs themselves Discuss both view and give your own opinion 67
- The rise of cyberbullying What are the causes of this problem and the steps that schools can use to prevent it 73
- We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kind of people In your opinion what are some important characteristics of a co worker 61
- Explain some reason about people are damaging to environmet what should governments and individuals can do 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tables'' or 'table's'?
Suggestion: tables'; table's
...over the given period. In terms of the tables information, the moneys resources were ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26744186047 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9967983637 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68023255814 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6160256369 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238690483958 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946774801264 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514719530072 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132537290462 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056512698781 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.