The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table and charts illustrate the police budget for two years: 2017 and 2018 in a particular region in Britain. The table demonstrates the sources of funds for the department and the charts show how it was spent. Overall, the money came from the National Government funds and distributed to pay for officers and staff salaries was the majority, while the police department received less from other sources such as grants, and the money spent on technology was the least.
As shown in the table, in both years, the federal government allocated the most in funding for the police department. In 2017 and 2018, the national administration contributed £177,5 and £177,8 million respectively which accounted for just over 58% of the total budget in 2017 and nearly 56% in 2018. Followed by the money from local taxes which reached £91,2 million occupying approximately 30% in 2017 and £102,3 million accounting for 32% in 2018. Subsidies for the officer and staff are the lowest which is £38 million in 2017 and increased by £0,5 million in 2018. This budget took up around 12% of the grand total in two years.
As for the pie chart, the money which was distributed to salaries of officers and staff took up the most percentage of the chart. This rate was three quarters in 2017 and 69% in 2018. The smallest proportion was the money consumed by technology. This figure occupied 4% and 14% in 2017 and 2018 separately. Police infrastructures and means of transport consumed the same amount of money in two years which stayed at 17% of the money in total.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an agi 84
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 81
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 67
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch stayed at 17% of the money in total.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82835820896 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62728965371 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485074626866 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0431783175 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5384615385 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38461538462 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321891058398 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123488190114 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850525161748 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234473307755 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975551758071 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.