Table and notes below give information about student enrollments at Brighton Co ed Secondary school a privately run fee paying institute in 1990 2000 and 2010

Essay topics:

Table and notes below give information about student enrollments at Brighton Co-ed Secondary school a privately run, fee paying institute in 1990, 2000, and 2010.

The table illustrates the data of Brighton Co-ed Secondary school enrolments, which is a privately running and fee paying institute, in 1990, 2000, and 2010. Overall, within 3 decades number of students who enrolled in school reached full capacity.

It is clear from the table that, in 1990, the number of enrolled students in school was 800 which continued to increase in the following decades untill it reached full capacity of 3400 students in 2010. We can see that, the percentage of females was decreasing while compared with the percentage of males. Since there are 95% of students who resided within 5 miles of Brighton and Hove in 1990, this proportion was continuously declined to 75%in 2010.

With regards to overseas students who came from European Union was 100 percent in 1990, it sae a 13% reduction in number in 2000 and further 11% decrease in 2010. In contrast, the percentage of the non EU overseas students significantly rose to 24% at the end of the year. However, in 2010, overall proportion of overseas students five times as much as that of 1990.

In conclusion, although more number of students started to come from overseas, the overall percentage of overseas students reached their target.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (41 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-31 KHUSHALI KAMALIYA 78 view
2019-03-07 Ania 85 view
2016-08-18 testbigabhinav 75 view
Essays by user Ania :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n contrast, the percentage of the non EU overseas students significantly rose to ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while, in conclusion, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00490196078 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.682922447 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5510413801 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310052307663 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136840589278 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133270591111 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202799530357 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148867368746 0.0819641961636 182% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.