A glance at the provided table illustrates the preferences in differents ways to travel of English people in the year1985 and 2000.
This is such a clear-cut evidence from supplied information that need for travel in England rose significantly, with 4740 miles travelled per person in 1985 and 6475 miles travelled per person in 2000. In addition, other transports were chosen more more in 2000 comparing with 1985, standing at 585 miles travelled per person and 450 miles travelled per person respectively.
To begin with, it can be seen clearly that ways to travel which have faster speed and can be used for long distance including car, long distance bus, train, and taxi become more and more prevalent, among which the most common one was car, with 3199 miles travelled per person in 1985 and 4806 miles travelled per person in 2000. Miles travelled per person per year of other modes in this group saw a remarkable increase through the period of 15 years.
On the other hand, walking, bicycling, and local bus were not prefered anymore. Unquestionably, the use of bicycle for travel ranked last with only 41 miles travelled per person in 2000 although it was more popular than taxi in 1985. Walking and local bus were stll more common than some modes of travel in the above group such as long distance bus and taxi but they suffered a considerable decline during the period.
- Many university students live with their families while others need to live to live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations. 73
- some people think that rich countries should support poorer countries in terms of aid for health and aducation. To what extend do you agree ? 61
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 11
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 47
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: more
... addition, other transports were chosen more more in 2000 comparing with 1985, standing a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'more' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: more
... addition, other transports were chosen more more in 2000 comparing with 1985, standing a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in addition, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86075949367 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50101725819 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523206751055 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3567543575 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.625 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134361911308 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721713486657 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434213493036 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951915023737 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256208369093 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.