The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table illustrates the average distance traveled per person per year in miles by different modes of transport in England between 1985 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that car was the major means of transport which covered an average of 3,199miles per person per year in 1985 and increased to 4,806miles during the year 2000 whereas taxi covered the least distance traveled per person around 13miles in 1985 and 42miles in 2000.
Moreover, others covered around 450miles per person in 1985 and increased to 585miles in 2000 and Trains increased its annual transportation per person from 239miles in 1985 to 366miles in 2000. Likewise, local distance bus doubles the average distance traveled per person from 54miles in 1985 to 124miles in 2000.
Local bus decreased the means of transportation from 429miles to 274miles per person per year and in the same way, annual usage of bicycle per person decreased from 255 to 237miles while people walk on foot covered an average distance of 51miles in 1985 and decreased its rate to 41miles during the year 2000.
- proportion of population aged 65 and over in Japan, Sweden and USA 67
- News editors decide what to dobroadcast on television and what to print in newspaper.What factors do you think influence these decision ? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? 67
- the pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household, and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants. 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table illustrates the average distan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...port in England between 1985 and 2000. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
... overall, it is clear that car was the major mea...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...13 miles in 1985 and 42 miles in 2000. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raveled per person from 54 miles in 1985 to 124 miles in 2000. ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...miles in 1985 to 124 miles in 2000. Local bus decreased the means of transpo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rate to 41 miles during the year 2000.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, so, whereas, while, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29920634707 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.411458333333 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.5311856123 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.2 112.824112599 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.4 22.9334400587 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 5.23603664747 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137254847648 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127356293635 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093632465715 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138050865931 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10224855513 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.29 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.