The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in
England between 1985 and 2000.
The chart shows average distances that people in England travelled using different
forms of transport in the years 1985 and 2000.
It is clear that the total number of miles travelled by English people using all modes
of transport increased significantly between 1985 and 2000. The car was by far the
most used form of transport in both years.
In 1985, the average person travelled 3,199 miles by car, and this rose to 4,806
miles in the year 2000. The figures for miles travelled by train, long distance bus, taxi
and other modes also increased from 1985 to 2000. Travel by taxi saw the most
significant change, with more than a threefold increase from 13 miles per person per
year in 1985 to 42 miles in 2000.
There was a fall in the average distances for three forms of transport, namely
walking, bicycle and local bus. In 1985, English people walked an average of 255
miles, but this figure fell by 18 miles in 2000. Bicycle use fell from 51 to 41 miles over
the period shown, while the biggest downward change was in the use of local buses,
with average miles per person falling from 429 to 274 over the 15-year period.
- The maps illustrate some changes that were made to a city hospital s transport infrastructure between the years 2007 and 2010 73
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 78
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 61
- The table give information about five types vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 2014 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67487684729 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17517668882 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0058387118 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 15.0 3.83414634146 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190360622944 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100894936701 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775371776305 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808708424246 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672707156366 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.