The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied table compares the data on how differently people residing in England decided to commute in terms of an individual’s annual average trip length between the years of 1985 and 2000.
A quick glance at the chart reveals that people were traveling more frequently than they used to in 1985, especially by car.
As the data suggests, the British did not choose to catch a taxi so often in 1985 since the data reported was only 13 miles on average. However, the figure was observed to have risen to 42 miles in 2000. Besides, citizens of the country also tend to travel by long distance bus, train and car more regularly at the end of the period. Indeed, the use of cars led the way throughout the time span and appeared to witness the most significant leap, from 3199 miles to 4806 miles.
On the other hand, the people in the country of England are not as fond of traveling on foot as they were in 1985. They also showed less preference for riding bikes as the average trip length dropped by 10 miles, from 51 miles to 41 miles. In addition, the dominant use of personal vehicles might be the catalyst for the decline in distance traveled by public transportation such as local buses. The figure for how far people commuted by bus experienced a plunge of almost 100 miles.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry 78
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that benefi 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58189655172 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43350556118 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594827586207 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0951658101 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10374905536 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418062808943 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405886842365 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696743896567 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310872622678 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.