The table illustrates the average distance in miles travelled per person per year by different modes of travel in the years 1985 and 2000.
According to the data, the average distance covered by a person through car, long distance bus, train and taxi has increased in the year 2000 as compared to the year 1985. On an average, a person used to travel 3199 miles via car in 1985, which rose to 4,806 in 2000. Over the same period the miles travelled through train and long distance bus also rose from 289 and 54 to 366 and 124 respectively. The maximum rise is witnessed in Taxi from mere 13 miles i...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Zahra Ali
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons f 78
- Advantages and disadvantages of mobile phones in our daily lives 96
- Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages .If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion ,is it important for everyone to learn English?Should we try to ensure the survival of local la 56
- The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39035087719 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30274018123 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464912280702 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9258791306 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146424595105 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751329928614 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052044393766 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117603580229 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553552353398 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.