The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The given table provides information about the proportion of primary children who have difficulty with learning in two different schools the year 2005 and 2015.
As can be seen from the illustration, it is clearly evident that the percentage of pupils having educational problems in school A is much higher than in school B.
From 2005 to 2015, in school A, while proportions of students having problems with reading ability, handwriting and spelling are relatively unchanged, percentages of students having problems with listening skills, verbal expression, concentration and following instructions witnessed a sharp decrease. For instance, 40% of students with concentration problems in 2005 dropped to 18% in 2005. That figure of following instructions decreased 24% to 18% in 2015.
Between that period in school B, slight changes happened. Proportion of students with spelling difficulties increased 5% to one-tenth in 2015. That of following instruction doubled to 12% in 2015. Other problems areas remained stable
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 61
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64516129032 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1025886275 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 78.9830424057 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308975953257 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120001275688 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106274194263 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199407235897 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122082720048 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.