The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The given table indicates the proportion of distances travelled by various means of transportation surveyed in Shanghai in 1996, with an anticipation being given about a high motorization scenario in 2020. As illustrated by the table, the utilization of cars and trains is likely to witness a considerable increase in 2020 whereas the opposite pattern is expected in the remaining categories.
To specify, the percentage of passenger kilometers on foot is predicted to undergo a roughly two-fold decline from 7% to 3% in 2020. According to current projections, the use of scooter by Shanghai dwellers was recorded with 12% which is said to fall significantly by 5% until 2020. The similar trend can be seen in bicycle use whose proportion is estimated to experience a noticeable decrease from 27% to a negligible 3%, making it the least common mode of transport in Shanghai. It is also worth noting that in 1996, Although bus accounting for 39% was the most conventional means in 1996, it dropped sharply to 22% in 2020.
On the contrary, no figures was demonstrated for the train use in Shanghai in 1996 but it is projected to constitute 13% of travel distances in 2020. Only 15% of passenger kilometers was operated by car in the first investigated year, as opposed to an obvious rocket to 52% being anticipated in 2020
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | thaovuphuong19 | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | javad_70 | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time (excluding email).Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 84
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 67
- The bar chart shows the results of a survey which asked people the causes of crime 68
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('roughly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('two-fold') instead of another adjective.
...ometers on foot is predicted to undergo a roughly two-fold decline from 7% to 3% in 2020. Accordin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...distances in 2020. Only 15% of passenger kilometers was operated by car in the fi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0836957947 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596412556054 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.7023223659 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.375 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225926498091 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922071971665 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659904139709 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149427139837 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00759662273008 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.