The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001
The given charts indicate the annual operating expenditures of a specific school in the UK on five primary categories in 3 recorded years, namely 1981, 1991 and 2001. As illustrated by the chart, the overall costs spent on Insurance witnessed a consistent growth compared with the opposite trend seen in other workers’ salaries while the expenses devoted to the counterparts underwent noticeable erratic patterns. Also of note is that the hugest budget of this school was allocated for paying teachers monthly over the whole surveyed period.
It is evident that in 1981, this school spent a mere 2% of its yearly expenses on Insurance whereas the figure for other employees’ monthly pay stood at 28%. Over the following ten years, the share of money dedicated for Insurance climbed to 3% as opposed to the reverse pattern showed in staff salaries, with the portion declining by 6%. In 2001, overhead spending on Insurance was able to gradually bridge the gap with that of workers’ salaries, at 8% and 15% respectively.
Such dramatic differences were not seen in the figures for the remaining categories. Despite having seen a 10% increase in 1991, with exactly a half, followed with a fall to 45% in the final year, the portion of money allocated for teachers’ monthly pay was still the most tremendous financial burden of the mentioned school. Although both Resources as well as Furniture and Equipment marked the same share of money, at 15% in 1981, the former witnessed an increase to 20%in 1991, followed by a roughly two fold decrease in 2001 as opposed to a negligible 5% going up by 18% for the latter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart shows the results of a survey which asked people the causes of crime 73
- Some people believe that the advent of economical air travel has been very beneficial by making international travel more accessible, while others argue that it has had a very negative impact. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destruction of the world’s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or expe 78
- The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time (excluding email).Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... underwent noticeable erratic patterns. Also of note is that the hugest budget of th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nthly over the whole surveyed period. It is evident that in 1981, this school ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...salaries, at 8% and 15% respectively. Such dramatic differences were not seen ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ntioned school. Although both Resources as well as Furniture and Equipment marked the same...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ible 5% going up by 18% for the latter.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84437836202 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586080586081 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1071806616 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167078225587 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714375099526 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793295546396 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117589607951 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478128514006 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.