The table below gives information about values (NZ$) of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012.
The table illustrates how much New Zealand earned from exporting kiwi fruit to five various nations from 2010 to 2012.
Overall, while the value of export to Japan, China, and Russia followed an upward trend, the opposite was true for Mexico and Saudi Arabia. Also, of the five kiwi fruit importing countries, Japan was by far the largest one.
Looking at the table in more detail, we can see that the amount of money New Zealand earned from exporting kiwi fruit to Japan was over 271 million dollars, compared with nearly 75 million dollars and 968, 000 dollars of China and Russia, respectively. 2 years later, the value of export to Japan gradually grew to 325, 300, 000 dollars, the highest figure shown on the table, much higher than that of China with 94 million dollars and Russia with 2, 404, 000 dollars.
Turning to the other countries, in 2010, the amount of money New Zealand earned from Mexico and Saudi Arabia were much lower compared to those of the other three countries, ranging from nearly 300, 000 dollars to 6 million dollars. Over the following 2 years, these figures witnessed a decreasing fluctuation to 3, 300, 000 dollars of Mexico and 82 thousand dollars of Saudi Arabia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | duongbinhnam | view | |
| 2023-08-12 | duongbinhnam | view | |
| 2023-07-17 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Roy An | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Roy An | 78 | view |
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 77
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The table below shows the number of visitors in the UK and their average spending from 2003 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80288461538 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26755458791 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528846153846 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6800386739 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.714285714 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232125166913 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132312780434 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132639323162 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188418539902 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143051496711 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.