The table illustrates the expenditure of different nations on different items in year 2002.
From first glance, it was noticeable that the category of food, drink and tobacco had the highest percentage among these three categories. The percentage of Turkey had the biggest proportion, which was around 32%, whereas the lowest was Sweden. People from three countries who only consumed within 20% of this category were from Italy, Spain and Turkey.
As the table demonstrate, Italian had spent more on appearance, which was 9%, while people in Sweden had spent the least. However, citizens from Ireland, Spain and Turkey had almost the same percentage which was almost 7%. On the other hand, people from these five countries had less expenditure on leisure and education, which were all below 5%.
To sum up, it was evident that citizens rather spent more on food, drinks and tobacco than going for leisure activities and studies.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is said that people s life now is becoming more and more stressful What are the causes and how to solve it 72
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012. 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, whereas, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17105263158 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4638311608 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.2786615906 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.25 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140350069558 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076258484873 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12733193953 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125418781137 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158924075539 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.