Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement
In this day and age, there is a much greater number of choices. This increase has caused a controversial debate and while opponents against this, I do believe that available options emerge because of the development of the 4.0 era.
First and foremost, modern life with its advancement in technology, especially the upsurge of the Internet, radically resulting in this problem. According to numerous media options, there are more modern methods helping worldwide citizens broaden their horizons. For instance, laptops and mobile phones, and social networks have opened the door for people to access breaking news and search down the needed information more easily. In the past, it was time-consuming for people to widen their knowledge due to the lack of cutting-edge technologies. At this present, newspapers were the only way for people to gain current affairs.
In addition, the positive progress of technology also leads to some changes in the way people work. To be exact, countless benefits of the Internet such as its convenience, enabling people to effectuate things even in a long distance. By the same token, at the present, worldwide residents prefer to telecommute than commute to work by various transport means which people in the past used to do. These changes, therefore, could also save a range of time and travel costs for people.
In conclusion, this world presents us with a plethora of options in every aspect of life. With these aforementioned ideas, I am convinced that the existence of choice is related to the primary factor, which is the new era's development.
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in writing formal academic essay for particular university course 80
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The pie charts above show the comparison of the proportion of energy produced by different sources in an European country in 1995 and 2005 80
- The table compares the percentage of mobile phone owners using their phone features from 2006 to 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use of the development of the 4.0 era. First and foremost, modern life with its...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay for people to gain current affairs. In addition, the positive progress of te...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of time and travel costs for people. In conclusion, this world presents us wi...
^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'eras'' or 'era's'?
Suggestion: eras'; era's
...to the primary factor, which is the new eras development.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1583011583 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84187719769 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65250965251 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8961169688 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.769230769 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150549852158 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047496962465 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032867229 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849234574073 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289435026163 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.