The table below provides information on rental charges and salaries in three areas of London Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write at least 150 words

The given table daily needs the data regarding the comparison between line rental charges for a week as well as the annual salaries of people having one to three beds in three various regions of London.

I take glance, it is quite evident from the scenario that as the base getting braces, so dusty number of beds taken by the individuals. Moreover, Notting Hill Ajit out counterparts in case of Frnd salaries.

As per illustration, Notting Hill is the most expensive region of London with a minimum remuneration of £98,500. However, the rental charges here starts from £372 for one bed to £485 for three beds. Followed by Regents Park, with a salary package ranging from £85,500 to £170,500 with a rental charge of £325 to £650 for one to three beds.

On the contrary, Fulham in London accounted for a least figure in both entities with a notable difference when compared to the other two areas. Furthermore, it is the most affordable area of London. Interestingly, the rental charges doubled considerably when it comes to three beds.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'tables'.
Suggestion: tables
The given table daily needs the data regarding the comp...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on of London with a minimum remuneration of £98,500. However, the rental charges ...
^^
Line 8, column 49, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ontrary, Fulham in London accounted for a least figure in both entities with a no...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92134831461 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68746100637 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.650124093 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18134952027 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075139824186 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534202534769 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106557676542 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627828622442 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.