The table below show the avarage weekly salary between men and women
The table illustrates weekly earned income per person of both male and female in different career fields.
Overall, men’s earnings are always higher than women’s in all kinds of occupations. Additionally, there is a difference in order between men and women.
The gap in salary of both groups depends on career fields. In a descending order, the gap declines from technicians with $500 to $350 for both service and clerical workers, $250 for manual laborers and $100 for professionals. One fact to highlight from this table is that the gap of technicians is 5 times as much as gap of professionals.
About salary ranking, the table also indicates a difference between men and women. Men are well-paid with $2000 per week in the professional field, and the worst job goes with manual work for $1100, an increase of approximately 82%. Whilst, women earn $1900 as weekly payment for professionals, which exceeds 2 times higher than the lowest wage for manual labor with $850.
- Many museums and historical sites are not visited by local people What are the causes of this and what can be done about it 73
- the table below shows the average weekly salaries of men and women 73
- Many museums and historical sites are not visited by local people What are the causes of this and what can be done about it 92
- The table below show the avarage weekly salary between men and women 78
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and female in different career fields. Overall, men’s earnings are always highe...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...worst job goes with manual work for 100, an increase of approximately 82%. Whilst...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01226993865 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89110063302 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0419306176 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237727038857 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131279501753 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114228447393 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153207987829 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828554262073 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.