The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The table compares the amount of waste that was produced by six nations from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, except for Korea, the figure for waste production increased in five out of the six countries. Besides, the US always produced the largest waste for over 20 years.
The waste of the US rapidly rose from 131 (1980) to 192 million tonnes (2000). Between 1980 and 1990, waste production also climbed quickly, in Japan and Korea, from 28 to 32 and from zero to 31 million tonnes, respectively. By 2000, while Korea tended to cut its waste to 19 million tonnes, the waste of Japan went up gradually to 53 million tonnes.
Between 1980 and 2000, waste production slowly increased, in Poland and Portugal, from 4 to 6.6 and from 2 to 5 million tonnes, respectively. From 1980 to 1990, the waste of Ireland decreased slightly from 0.6 million tonnes to zero. By 2000, although the production rose to the same number as Portugal, this level still was the lowest point.
</span><div><br></div>
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Whycould this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 56
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 73
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life? 67
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 73
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, still, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97674418605 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19443810859 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529069767442 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8236122258 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1111111111 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219001019582 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105217952448 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276612349731 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111145130153 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568297872852 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.