The table below shows the average band scores for students from 4 different countries taking the IELTS Test in 2009

The table gives the information about the average band scores of students from 4 different countries who took the IELTS Test in 2009
Overall, speaking is the most popular skill of students in four countries in the 2009 IELTS exam. It is clear that while students in Germany got the highest scores in three skills which were listening, speaking and writing, Malaysian students received the highest score in reading skills.
In 2009, while students in Germany got 6.7 in overall, Malaysian students only got 6.4 at the same time. During this time, German and Malaysian students' highest score in speaking were 6,9 and 6,8 respectively. While reading skill was the lowest performing skill in German and in Malaysia, writing skill was the most challenge for students there.
It can be seen that while students in France got 6.5 overall, Vietnamese students only got 6.3 overall. In both reading and listening skills, Vietnamese and French students had the same scores with 6.1 in reading skill and 6.3 in listening skill. Although the writing score of Vietnamese students was 6.2, it was still quite low comparing to French students when they reached 6.5 in 2009.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries who took the IELTS Test in 2009 Overall, speaking is the most popular sk...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the highest score in reading skills. In 2009, while students in Germany got 6...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'students the highest'.
Suggestion: students the highest
... During this time, German and Malaysian students highest score in speaking were 6,9 and 6,8 res...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and Malaysian students highest score in speaking were 6,9 and 6,8 respectively. ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the most challenge for students there. It can be seen that while students in Fr...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03626943005 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43994693165 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497409326425 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9801091404 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294867905514 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139900775136 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140223929673 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248458339403 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177851632351 0.0819641961636 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.