The table below shows daily oil production in four countries from 2000 to 2004
The table given illustrates the information about the amount of oil which is produced in four different countries, namely Nigeria, Chad, Conga and Somalia from over the course of 4 years from 2000 to 2004.
In general, out of the four countries the Congo produced the highest amount of oil all the have shown whereas the amount of all other countries rose through the years.
In 2000, Conga ranked the highest point in the quantities of oil with 275,000 barrels per day while just lower than in the oil production in Nigeria and Somalia, about 205,000 and 50000 respectively.
Between 2000 and 2004, the figure for Congo saw a sore and peak in 2004, roughly 203,000 barrels. This was the same pattern to Somalia, the amount of daily oil production in this country grew tenfold over the 4 years, from 5000 to 50,000 respectively.
Regarding Nigeria, there was a slight fluctuation in manufacturing oil from 2000 to 2002 before increasing minimally in 2004, around 213,000. At this point, Chad was the only nation produced oil which just emerged in this 2 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view |
- THE CHART BELOW SHOWS THE ACTUAL AND ESTIMATED NUMBER OF VISITORS TO A NEW ART GALLERY FROM ITS OPENING DATE IN 1990 UP TO AND INCLUDING 2001 iT ALSO INDICATES THREE EVENTS IN THE GALLERY S LIFE BELOW THE CHART THERE ARE TWO PIE CHARTS WHICH SHOW THE SATI 70
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok 69
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who own devices from 2010 to 2025 74
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK citiy between 1989 and 2009 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 69
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8956043956 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51836030595 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1866600445 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342192049914 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153189175348 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656121856084 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185338941148 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608875837543 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.