The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002

Essay topics:

The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002.

The table illustrates the advertising consumptions of 4 different car companies in the UK in 2002.
Overall, Renault had the most remarkable value on advertising while Cetirizine paid least money to advertise its products.
The type of advertisement that Renault focused on is TV at 59 million dollars and press at 45 million dollars. 3 remaining type of advertisings were less noticeable than 2 types above which was 28 million dollars in total.
The rest companies mentioned in the table had the same expenditures on publicizing their cars. These companies spent most of their money to advertise on TV. Whereas Rover paid about 38 million dollars for its products on press, Vauxhall and Cetirizine spent 15 million dollars advertising on radio. Although both Rover’s and Cetirizine’s expenditures on publicising in cinema were 0 dollar, Vauxhall’s consumption on advertisement in theatre was 5 million dollars. Vauxhall also paid 7 million dollars to introduce its cars outdoor while Rover and Cetirizine spent less money advertising outdoor.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-30 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-09-06 nguyentuancn13@gmail.com 67 view
2023-08-01 Bttn1482k view
2023-03-26 TLan168 84 view
2023-03-26 TLan168 view
Essays by user TLan168 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'paid the least'.
Suggestion: paid the least
...e value on advertising while Cetirizine paid least money to advertise its products. The t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 384, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...ditures on publicising in cinema were 0 dollar, Vauxhall’s consumption on advertisemen...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43902439024 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17288857222 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4433962078 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22492763027 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126347310626 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127766156495 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190179998371 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164308326013 0.0819641961636 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.