The table below shows how many people (in millions) used different forms of public transport in Milan from 2010 to 2014.

Essay topics:

The table below shows how many people (in millions) used different forms of public transport in Milan from 2010 to 2014.

shown by table is the information about the number of people (in million) taking different types of public transportation in Milan during 5 years since 2010.

Overall we see that the number of metro users was higher than other transportation users. Moreover, there was ascending trend in the number of public transportation passengers during time frame.

In 2010, people choosing metro as transportation modes at 3.0 which became the most popular transportation. Furthermore, trains and trams had almost similar figure in the number of users. While the former accounted by 1.4 and the latter noted at1.3. Finally, there were two unpopular transportation services used by only 1.0 pessengers for buses and 0.6 passanger for taxis.

After 4 years, Metro and Trains experienced a significant growth in the number of passengers to 5.0 (the highest figure recorded) and by almost three-fold to 3.6 severally. Likewise, the passengers pf buses and trams increased by about 150% to 2.4 for former, despite experiencing a downward trend in 2011 to 0.8 and by 0.9 to 2.2 for latter. Lastly, Taxis users rose slightly by 0.1 every year to 1.0 in the end of survey.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-05 argaudart 78 view
2019-09-05 argaudart 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Shown
shown by table is the information about the n...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...formation about the number of people in million taking different types of public transp...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, lastly, likewise, moreover, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13684210526 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94481092047 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621052631579 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.499961896 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.444444444 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167538640849 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692609090872 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987369327762 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125981358688 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120007609362 0.0819641961636 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.