The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and the projected figure for 2025 and 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table demonstrates the changes that have taken place in the population numbers for four different countries in 2003 and predicted figures in 2025 and 2050. Overall, while the overall population in Argentia was the lowest in 2003, that trend will be seen in Italy in 2025 and 25 years later. Additionally, the figures for Indonesia have always been the highest compared to the other three nations.
Regarding Indonesia, 238 million of people was recorded in 2003, which will increase to 274 and 312 million of people in 2025 and 2050 respectively, making it the most populous nation throughout the period. In terms of Republic of Korea, in 2003, it was observed that the figure was 48 million of residents who were living in this country; subsequently, in the next 22 years and so on to 2050, there will be a slight rise related to these data, at 52 million of people in both years.
Turning to Argentina and Italy. In the first year of the recording, 34 million of people and 54 million of people were reported in Argentina and Italy respectively. Throughout the period of over two decades, the projected figures for both countries will be nearly the same at around 47 million of populations. Yet, in 2050, the total of people in Argentina will be much higher than that in Italy, which will be 62 million of people in Argentina and 45 million of people in Italy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and the plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Topic in the attached picture 11
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The pie and bar charts below show the percentage of water consumption and use in Australia in 2004 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71369294606 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60199392984 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514522821577 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5819680937 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.222222222 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203588727115 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101799057681 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101323810902 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160770682447 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103240776295 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.