The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.( IELTS BOOK 4 TEST 1)
The vertical bar graph reveals that how european countries use three different types of material disposal methods between 2006 to 2008.The data calibrated in million of tonnes.
Overall, it is lucid that the landfill was the famous process for waste disposal during early years and this popularity decrease over the period because of damping in sea increase their popularity in terms of waste disposal.
According to the data, in 2006 landfill method was most popular. european use this process for 2000 metrics tonnes disposal. this method decrease their popularity in 2007 and at the and of the year only 1200 metric tone waste disposal by using landfill method.On other hand dumping process increase their popularity in terms of waste disposal moreover this amount was upsurge 200 metric tonnes every year till 2008. At the beginning exact 900 metric tonnes waste disposal by this method and at the end of graph this amount slightly decrease.
- Some people think that introducing new technology canimprove people's quality of life in the developing countries.However, others believe that free education should beoffered. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples 84
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family.Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job?What other factors should be considered 61
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.( IELTS BOOK 4 TEST 1) 11
- It is said that "Not everything that is learned is contained in books".Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The vertical bar graph reveals that how ...
^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...l disposal methods between 2006 to 2008.The data calibrated in million of tonnes. ...
^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...een 2006 to 2008.The data calibrated in million of tonnes. Overall, it is lucid th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...data calibrated in million of tonnes. Overall, it is lucid that the landfill w...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opularity in terms of waste disposal. According to the data, in 2006 landfill ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: European
... 2006 landfill method was most popular. european use this process for 2000 metrics tonne...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ocess for 2000 metrics tonnes disposal. this method decrease their popularity in 200...
^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...waste disposal by using landfill method.On other hand dumping process increase the...
^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of waste disposal moreover this amount was upsurge 200 metric tonnes every year...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15584415584 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32071780964 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.7471392546 43.030603864 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.333333333 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00777981859859 0.215688989381 4% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0049506136354 0.103423049105 5% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0110699086191 0.0843802449381 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0099012272708 0.15604864568 6% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140024498905 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.