The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The given table indicates the percentage of various types of households inhabiting in poor conditions in Australia in a specific year. The information that belongs to 6 different categories of families is present with an approximate number of people.
The majority of aged population were considerably one of the least poor household types. While the proportion of the unmarried ones were detected to be 6%, the rate of couples who were old were likely to be lower than the lone elderly (4%). Nearly a quarter of the sole parents were living in poverty in 1999 (232,000 individuals) which is the highest amount of people in comparison with other categories. Even though only 12% of couples with children were living below average standards, the rate almost equals to a million people which can be considered as the biggest number. The portion of single inhabitants with no child was facing poverty was inclined to be greater (19%) rather than the level of couples (7%). Additionally, the quantity of single individuals without children was detected to be roughly 360,000 whereas, the ratio of partners was around 210,000.
In conclusion, numerous categories of households who were poor individuals in 1999 in Australia were observed to be approximately 2 million people which can be directed as 10% of the population more or less.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Mubashir123 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | farmaniefr@gmail.com | view | |
| 2022-08-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | whencanIpassIELTsbyscore7 | view | |
| 2021-12-01 | Elenochka315 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- Some people say that relationships should be based on honesty and trust Others believe that it is sometimes necessary to be dishonest in order to maintain harmony Which approach do you consider to be better in relations 89
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...h an approximate number of people. The majority of aged population were consid...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.0 300% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11467889908 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87525409379 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564220183486 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1447344151 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.888888889 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166366307777 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665524545014 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515412249498 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122393323049 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457276067768 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.