The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009

Essay topics:

The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.

The provided table gives information on how students spent their time in 4 different schools (in percentage) from 2000 to 2009. Overall, it can be seen that the pupils attending percentage in community schools boomed gradually. By contrast, others schools had experienced downward trends.
In 2000, the figure for community schools stood at 12%. After 2 years, it almost tripled to 32%, and it rocked up significantly by 4 years period (58%), leading to the highest school attended by pupils. For voluntary-controlled schools, at the beginning of the year, it had massive percentage of pupils (52%). Furthermore, it was the highest number of pupils, but it decreased dramatically (20%) by the end of period.
In 2000, it was 24% pupils who attend in grammar schools, and the proportion experienced a slightly decrease (19%) in 2005. It was in 2009 that percentage for grammar schools dropped to 12%. Compared to others, specialist schools were the least schools which attended by student between 2000 (12%) and 2009 (10%). It can be seen the figure for specialist schools felt slightly over the period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-29 Siska Umila Adha view
Essays by user Fila :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...schools, and the proportion experienced a slightly decrease 19% in 2005. It was in 2009 that percen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06111111111 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95966193431 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8594465187 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8181818182 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279622315447 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107955194101 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715807024275 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196459078345 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702741938423 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.