In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set, microwave oven. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
A wider range of household goods such as TV set and microwave oven are more chosen by people in many countries to buy. This essay will try to explain why this trend is a positive development.
First of all, it can be surely admitted that human’s needs are increasing, especially household goods since it could ease people’s work. It means that more and more people will buy these in order that it can fulfill they satisfy and help them. Moreover, product advertisement is easier to be aired so that many individuals get attracted to buy household goods, causing to higher product selling. It is evident that product advertisement has big influence to attract people to buy product which is advertised. Furthermore, internet and smartphone make product sell faster since nowadays people could access internet easily. By this, it can be said that internet will provide information on product selling.
Considering the positive development, there are many items having specific function to support people daily life. Not only do household ease our life but it gives entertainment as well. For example, in USA household, there are many house owning automatic dishwasher so woman could potentially take rest inasmuch as they task is replaced with household item. Consider another benefit, several household items give people some entertainment like TV. It seems that people’s stress which is caused by household task will be reduced. Finally, some company would possibly gain lots of income since individuals are eager to make their life easier, leading to company success by purchasing their product.
In conclusion, it can be assumed that human needs increasing, advertisement, and internet are the factors making people to buy household items. I strongly assume that it is positive development as not only can people be more relax, but some company will obtain massive income by product selling.
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possession Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent you do agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subject in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on the society 56
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject Do you agree or disagree 56
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun house seems to be countable; consider using: 'many houses'.
Suggestion: many houses
...or example, in USA household, there are many house owning automatic dishwasher so woman co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'houses'?
Suggestion: houses
...ample, in USA household, there are many house owning automatic dishwasher so woman co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2393442623 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7664749229 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0954995872 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.875 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323575035531 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115026863677 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133284301439 0.0667982634062 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241804139611 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160760750073 0.056905535591 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.