Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
Wasting food is a common phenomenon today, either wasting restaurant-bought food or supermarket-bought food. This essay will explain the reason why people throw their food and provide the way to prevent this trend.
To start with, it can be said that humans always try to fulfill their daily needs, and food is the important one. However, people consider that food which they own is not enough, so that they buy food in restaurants without thinking first, and actually it is more than enough, leading to wasting their food. Moreover, in supermarkets, the food product which is sold sometimes close to expired date, and people assume that it is not safe to eat something that is almost expired. By this, it means that people are reluctant to eat that food inasmuch as they are afraid that it will be harmful for them,
Considering some solutions, first, it is important to make a list and make a priority scale on food that they have to buy, meaning that they will buy foods based on their needs, so that wasting food could potentially be prevented. Second, before selling their food products, the grocery stores can check their product’s expired date first in order that they could potentially minimize throwing food. Furthermore, the customers have to be careful when they want to purchase foods in the supermarket.
To sum up, it can be seen that the reason why people waste their food are buying without thinking and not being careful in checking expired date. Making list and checking expired dates are the possible ways to prevent this phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject Do you agree or disagree 56
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- University students always focus on one specific subject but some people think university should encourage their students to study a range of subject in addition to their own subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possession Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent you do agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams for example football Other people think that taking part in individual sports such as swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90151515152 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61560093052 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 377.1 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6807204036 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.4 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433958627255 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201082442742 0.084324248473 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11244309318 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307487332956 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730059318182 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.