The table below shows the salaries of secondary/high school teachers in 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
The table below demonstrates the information about secondary or high school salaries paid for teachers in five countries in 2009.
Overall, the highest salaries can be found in Luxembourg, starting with 80,000 dollars. However, Australia was the lowest-earning country out of the five with 28,000 dollars.
In 2009, teachers in Luxembourg were paid $80,000 at the start of their teaching career, almost double the figure in Denmark at $45,000. Salaries in Luxembourg and Denmark are twice as high as in the other three. Teachers earned $34,000 in Japan, $30,000 in South Korea and $28,000 in Australia.
A Luxembourg teacher may earn up to 119,000 dollars after 15 years of experience and 132,000 dollars at their highest salary after 15 years of experience. Furthermore, in two Asian nations, Japan and Korea, teachers with 15 years experience had salaries with 65,000 dollars and 48,000 dollars. These numbers could increase up to 86,000 dollars and 62,000 dollars of maximum salary. Beside that, teachers in Australia and Denmark had salaries after 15 years of working in secondary or high schools with 48,000 dollars and 54,000 dollars. With the maximum salary, the teacher's salary also stops at 48,000 and 54,000 dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | view | |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
- Some people think that young people should follow the traditions of the society Others think young people are free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 11
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 567, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...0 dollars. With the maximum salary, the teachers salary also stops at 48,000 and 54,000 ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25510204082 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5740390054 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3562865356 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6363636364 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134721286887 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797077856364 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985665520182 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137815173203 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134836791811 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.