The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below shows the salaries of secondary/high school teachers in 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant

The table illustrates data about the income of teachers at high school in 2009

Overall, in Luxembourg teachers had the highest salaries of the 6 countries in 2009. Meanwhile, Australia was ranked as having the lowest teacher income. 

Looking at details, the starting salary for Luxembourg was 80.000 dollars. However, after 15 years it increased to 119.000 dollars, and it peaked to 132.000 dollars after 30 years. On the other hand, the second range was Japan with a dramatically higher salary from 34.000 dollars to 86.000 in 37 years later. Last place in teacher salaries was Australia with 28,000 at the start. 15 years later it increased to 48,000 and there was no change.

The remaining countries were Denmark and South Korea. The salaries of teachers at Denmark begin at 45.000, then rose to 54.000 and remained at this level. Teacher salaries in high schools in Korea fluctuate. The starting salary in this country was $30,000, then it increased by $10,000 after 15 years, and reached $62,000 after 34 years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-30 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 73 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 73 view
2023-07-03 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
Essays by user TLan168 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ked as having the lowest teacher income.  Looking at details, the starting salary ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, second, so, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01764705882 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4525179491 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5358274856 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121978660058 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072415355275 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912260485414 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120782984964 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683278351099 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.