The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below shows the salaries of secondary/high school teachers in 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The table illustrates the fluctuation in the salaries of teachers in secondary and high schools in 2009 in 5 different countries.
Overall, teachers in Luxembourg had the highest level of income, while the figure for Australia witnessed the lowest. Additionally, Japanese teachers took more years to reach maximum salaries than other countries.
Looking at the three nations that had high levels of income, including Luxembourg, Japan, and Korea. Starting at 80,000 dollars for the freshers, teachers in Luxembourg could earn 119,000 dollars per month with 15 years of experience and 132,000 dollars after 30 years of working in the educational system. On the other hand, the figures for those working in Japan and Korea were significantly lower, at about 30,000 dollars for new teachers in both countries, followed by 86,000 dollars for a thirty-seven-year teacher in Japan and 62,000 dollars for a thirty-four-year teacher in Korea.
Turning to Australia and Denmark. Although the fluctuation in the beginning of the two nations was remarkable, at 28,000 dollars per month for Australian teachers and 45,000 dollars per month for those in Denmark, the variation decreased and was nearly the same after about over 8 years, at roughly 50,000 dollars for a teacher in a month.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-30 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 73 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 73 view
2023-07-03 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
Essays by user minhnhat2002 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30049261084 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93786099106 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536945812808 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.7405113369 43.030603864 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 134.5 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0956266592054 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692817919889 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993579630482 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117099808153 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1224250212 0.0819641961636 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.