The table illustrates the numbers of international tourism in top five countries in 2 years of period. Overall, France, USA, Spain, and Italy slightly increased while the one other countries decline at the end. The number of tourists was measured in million dollars whereas tourist expense counted in billion.
To begin, there was a slight improved in France from 2012 to 2013 by 1,7 millions while the tourist’s expense increased marginally in two years by $2.5 billions. On the other hand, same thing happened in USA and Spain. Both stated data shows a significant increased in the number of comers. Furthermore, tourist spent more in 2013 in USA and Spain, with $139.6 billion and $60.4 billion by sequence. Meanwhile, Italy’s comers also rose slightly, by 1.3 millions.
However, the number of people who visited China in 2012 to 2013 decreased. Surprisingly, China’s tourists spent more in 2013, with $51.7 billions. The trend was ended by USA comers who spent the most while the number of tourists who visit France is the highest.
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in2012 and 2013. 78
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a car. 67
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations statistics. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Is it a positive or negative development 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... The number of tourists was measured in million dollars whereas tourist expense counted...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...lars whereas tourist expense counted in billion. To begin, there was a slight impro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11627906977 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77385908313 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8415448744 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124719058054 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567213648142 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986152214854 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934784914485 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649533473455 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.