The provided table elucidates the arrival of abroad tourists in millions in 8 different regions and the proportion of shifts.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that France had the most overseas visitors and Hong Kong had the least international tourists in both years. It is also noticeable that Hong Kong was the only country having negative percentage growth.
Looking at the table, it is clear that France had the most abroad tourists when it contributed to 76 million people in 2009 as well as 2010. By contrast, Hong Kong just had 10 million visitors from overseas in 2009 which was more than 1 million compared to Hong Kong in 2010. The US had more than 1 million international travelers during 2010 (67 million) as opposed to 2009 (66 million). Spain and Italy also had the same situation as the US when the number of tourists during 2009, 2010 were 55 million and 56 million respectively in Spain and 44 million, 45 million accordingly in Italy. The UK, Turkey, China, and Germany were having more travelers from abroad in 2010 compared to 2009.
Germany had a massive amount of percentage growth (+109%). Took second place and third place were China (+55%) and Turkey (+33%). The UK, the US, Spain, and Italy were all had a little amount of proportion increased. Hong Kong was the only nation having a declining percentage (-11%).
- Some people think the news has no connection to people s lives so it is a waste of time to read the news in the newspaper and watch television news programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Differences between countries are becoming less evident Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 78
- The table gives information about departments and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, look, second, so, third, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54736703724 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0462708083 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313270377336 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115552960975 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829411875273 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168800125826 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946424009187 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.