The given table illustrates the information about the average hours spent per week in front of the computer for different purposes such as internet surfing, playing games, for business purposes etc. by people of different age groups in China.
Overall, it is evident that the younger generation spent more time with computers whereas the elder people use computer the least.
Starting from younger generation, the boys around the age group 10-15 spent 10 hours with computer however the girls of the same age group use it lesser than 2 hours compared to boys. The teenagers are the ones who are addicted to computers and holds the first place in using computers as boys spent 24 hours and girls spent 23 hours. The age group of 21-25 holds the second place as the male spent 12 hours and the female spent 10 hours with computer.
Going further to elder people i.e. age group of 26-30, male and female equally spent 9 hours with computer. In the age group of 31-50, male spent 8 hours while the female spent 9 hours using computers. The least usage of computers are by the age group 51+ as male spent 7 hours and female spent 8 hours .
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping Is this a positive or negative development 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping Is this positive or negative development Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own know 61
- The table gives information about the average hours spent per week in front of the computer for Internet surfing playing games for business purposes by people of different age groups in China 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use computer the least. Starting from younger generation, the boys around the ...
^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ame age group use it lesser than 2 hours compared to boys. The teenagers are the ...
^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n using computers as boys spent 24 hours and girls spent 23 hours. The age group ...
^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mputer. Going further to elder people i.e. age group of 26-30, male and female...
^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of 26-30, male and female equally spent 9 hours with computer. In the age group ...
^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 8 hours while the female spent 9 hours using computers. The least usage of comp...
^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e spent 7 hours and female spent 8 hours .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66831683168 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20564267687 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480198019802 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9224297134 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.777777778 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45041962829 0.215688989381 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224962998465 0.103423049105 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146264961363 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315887050611 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.241511830084 0.0819641961636 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.