Table (The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia).
The table gives information about the fluctuation of coffee prices in six major cities in Australia between 2010 and 2014.
In general, it is apparent that while the price of a cup of coffee remained stable in Brisbane during the examined period, other areas experienced greater increases in price. Melbourne, one of the thriving metropolitans in Australia, was notably making the most dominant profits for coffee consumption.
Looking at the table, starting at nearly $2.4 in 2010, Melbourne quickly took the lead with significant growth at $2.9 after four years, making up more than a quarter of the coffee price. On the contrary, Sydney, known as the most prestigious city in Australia, stood at the highest coffee price, approximately $3 at the beginning before witnessing a slight rise to over $3 in 2014. This figure accelerated the price rate of coffee to more than one in ten.
Meanwhile, both Canberra and Adelaide were undergoing fairly the same price in 2010 and then going up to around $2 in the next 4 years. There generated an average improvement, of 6.25 percent for the former, and 6.95 percent for the latter. It is noticeable that only Brisbane showed the level-out price for the whole period, accounting for $2.25.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | mylinh3001 | 84 | view |
- Topic The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 78
- The diagrams show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 78
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 73
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different ages in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the highest coffee price, approximately at the beginning before witnessing a sli...
^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... before witnessing a slight rise to over in 2014. This figure accelerated the pri...
^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rice in 2010 and then going up to around in the next 4 years. There generated an ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, then, while, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05911330049 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73093958422 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630541871921 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7862735545 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371756799788 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146977502166 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143372552913 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247728452036 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166364546482 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.