The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table compares charitable institutions in different countries in terms of their financial assistance in order to provide technology to developing countries over the period of 4 years
Overall, there was an upward trend in the amount of money given in technological aid of all countries during the period shown. The vast majority of financial support for technology to developing countries was from the US charities
Looking more closely at the chart, in 2006, the US charities supported about 9,7 billion USD for technology to developing countries, which was nearly 3 times as much as that of EU countries. While the figure for other countries was slightly lower, at approximately 2.7 billion dollars. The amount of money given technological aid to developing countries by charitable organizations in the US increased significantly to around 13.5 billion USD compared to merely 3.8 billion dollars that of EU countries in 2008
From 2009 to 2010, a substantial rise was seen in financial assistance by the US charities for technology to developing countries and this figure reached a peak at roughly 22.7 billion dollar. By contrast, the figures for EU and other countries climbed slowly, at just 4 and 3.3 billion USD respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | minhphambinh1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-28 | Chu Thị Hải | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | nguyen duc | 73 | view |
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Task2 Some people think success in life comes from hard work and determination Others think money and appearance are more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 71
- the illustrations show how chocolate is produced 64
- the bar chart show the distribution of employment among agriculture services and industries in three countries in 1980 and projected distribution in 2020 67
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching tv Therefore children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing countries over the period of 4 years Overall, there was an upward trend in th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amount of money given technological aid to developing countries by charitable or...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26633165829 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08127493022 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517587939698 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.373098403 43.030603864 294% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 209.6 112.824112599 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.8 22.9334400587 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345228251095 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193829042224 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798932898866 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231530014009 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494603399608 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.3 13.2329268293 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 61.2550243902 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.3012195122 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 30.5 11.4329268293 267% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 31.0 11.0658536585 280% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.