The table shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart illustrates information about Australian department stores and online stores in 2011.
Overall, online stores' figures were higher than their department counterparts in terms of all four criteria: number of businesses, profit, sales venue and growth. Additionally, it is noticeable that the most significant difference can be seen in the number of businesses between the two types of stores.
Sales revenue of online shops in Australia was 13400 AUD dollars, which was higher than that of department shops (12700 AUD dollars). Similarly, the profits generated from online retailing were also higher than those generated from traditional retailing, with respective figures being 86300 AUD dollars and 80700 AUD dollars.
Greater disparities can be seen how many businesses were conducted in two types of shops. While online stories had 368 businesses in 2011, department ones only had 67 businesses. Meanwhile, the growth rate of online stories was slightly higher than that of department stores, and the figures were 0.6% and 0.4% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-05-14 Hai Anh Phan Thi 78 view
2021-11-07 Wardiati Yusuf 56 view
2021-10-12 leanguyen view
2021-09-28 bepmy2992004 view
2021-09-28 bepmy2992004 100 view
Essays by user Hai Anh Phan Thi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The chart illustrates information about ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60248447205 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83304719309 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8942599148 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173904197754 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956084316182 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132560775517 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158987921713 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158662321077 0.0819641961636 194% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.