The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901
The table compares the number of workers and manufactories making silk in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
The most striking feature is that the figures for women working in factories were higher than those for the men each year. In addition, the number of factories increased gradually, whereas there were fewer and fewer employees during the time surveyed.
In 1851, there were exactly 272 factories in 1815 and this figure climbed dramatically to 623 factories in 1901. In contrast, the total silk workforce was highest, at 130750 people and it then dropped steadily and reached its bottom at just only 38942 employees in the next 50 years.
A drop in the total employees as a result of a decrease gradually in the number of male and female workers. There were 76786 female worked in the factories compared to 53964 male workers in 1851. However, the period between 1851 and 1901 saw a considerable fall each year in the number of women employees and then reached its bottom at 13375 workers. Similarly, the figure for men dropped quickly to 13375 people in 1901, a decrease of nearly 40000 people within 50 years.
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 73
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 87
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 89
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 76
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... dramatically to 623 factories in 1901. In contrast, the total silk workforce was ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, then, whereas, in addition, in contrast, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84455958549 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44580441721 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533678756477 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6648408268 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33402216435 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139418999475 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111118964192 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222054833166 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116340106456 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.