The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The table graph sets out the sales of mobile phones over the six-year period from 2006 to 2012. The measure unit was millions.
In general, Motorola was the unique brand that experienced a sharp fall over six years. The sales of Nokia and Ericsson showed a mix performance. And two other brands increased, but the most significant change was in Apple.
It is clear from the chart that Motorola was the only brand that had a downturn. About 210 mobile phones were sold in 2006, the number decreased nearly eightfold to 28 in 2012. Being in the first place in 2006 with 345 million mobile phones being sold, over the first two years, the figures of Nokia rose gradually and peaked at 475 million, after a steady fall in the next year, the number increased again to 463 million and plunged to 335 million in 2012. There was a slight fluctuation in the sales of Ericsson. Despite a growth in 2007, its number went down consistently, by about 60% to 28 after six years.
Contrary to the downward trend in the first three brands, the statistic of Samsung and Apple rose sharply. Sold 117 million mobile phones in 2006, six years later, Samsung had its statistics increased over threefold, and became the top selling brand of this device. Apple also underwent an upswing in its figures. Appeared in the market in 2007 with just 2.3 million, its sales soared considerably to 135,8 in 2012. Apple was the brand that had the most dramatic change among the five brands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-15 | nguyenthanhhoa1904 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | view | |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | view |
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The pie chart sets out the difference in the units of electricity produced by fuel sources of Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 56
- The chart shows the changes 73
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, in general, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68217054264 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3070449894 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531007751938 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.0397132609 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5333333333 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193451801453 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574095928159 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724800493614 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124867813477 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603643479081 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.