The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The given table depicts the number of five well-known major brands of cell phones which were sold over a six-year period. There are three clearly visible trends in the data. Firstly, both Apple and Samsung witnessed a progressive upward. Samsung started at 117 million and finished at just over 396 million which was the highest level of sales in 2012. Whereas, Apple began with the most modest figure, 2.3 million in 2007 but saw a prominent rate of speed to just under 136 million in 2012, outnumbering the growth of Samsung's sales and putting Apple in the third-highest position. Nokia volatilized from 2006 to 2012, starting at 345 million then carrying on rising until reaching a peak at 475 million in 2008. From 2008 to afterward, the saleS' rates fluctuated around 442 million before suffering final result at 335 million in 2012. Finally, both Ericsson and Motorola experienced a persistent drop pattern. Each of them achieved the lowest number of sales, only 28 million each in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-15 | nguyenthanhhoa1904 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | view | |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | view |
- To what extent has the internet made life more convenient Give reasons for your answer and give any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student s accommodation 11
- In some countries more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, so, then, third, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94610778443 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47685691553 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658682634731 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3432661281 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135652706142 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536514754081 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643251166805 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135652706142 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, so, then, third, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94610778443 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47685691553 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658682634731 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3432661281 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135652706142 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536514754081 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643251166805 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135652706142 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.