A table shows the percentage of employment in Australia for different age groups. A bar graph shows the percentage of part time employment in Australia by gender.
The table illustrates the changes and differences in the proportion of full-time and part-time employees in Australia provided by 6 different age groups and the column shows the percentage of both genders in part-time career.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that male workers dominate the job market, except for over 65 year-old group. However, regarding part-time job, it demonstrates the opposite trend, the female workers outnumber the male counterparts, except for 20-35 years old group that bucks the trend.
In particular, when it comes to employment including part-time and full-time job, the percentage of men from 14 to 65 years old account for higher numbers in comparison with women, with 60% - 75% for the former and 20% - 35% for the latter. In contrast, concerning over 65 year-old element, the given graph witnesses a contradictory trend, particularly with 10% for men and 15% for women, which constitute the lowest percentages.
Meanwhile, in terms of part-time jobs by gender, the percentages of 14-19 years old rank the top, with the highest numbers for men and women are 55% and 65% respectively. The percentages of part-time workers increase gradually from 20% for men and 30% for women in 36-45 year-old group to 40% for men and 50% for women in over 65 year-old group. However, regarding 20-35 year-old element, the percentage of men workers surpass that of women counterparts by 5 to 4, which occupy the lowest numbers in both genders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'element' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'elements'.
Suggestion: elements
...n contrast, concerning over 65 year-old element, the given graph witnesses a contradict...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, while, except for, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13278008299 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85708164824 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502074688797 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.5687720349 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.625 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.125 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309553947626 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154895357616 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124846100775 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223088576506 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138845736911 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.